歐洲社會民主之未來性?
Friday, September 26, 2008
社會民主在先進資本全面右轉的風潮中,未來性面臨考驗。這是一篇討論社會民主方向的文章,一篇異議雜誌上的報導,對於歐洲的社會民主發展作了精彩的分析。
這段文字蠻受用的,謹誌於下:All these contemporary trends look irrevocable and they are creating a new and complex working class that is characterized more by their internal differences than any sense of shared collective consciousness. This is particularly dangerous for the future health of social democracy. Historically, the democratic parties of the center-left in Europe won political power in the interwar years, but especially after 1945, through their popular electoral appeal as broad-based “people’s parties” that were also rooted on the once important core of the organized manual working class. They did so by adopting programs and values that were held together strongly by the ideology of socialism and then social democracy. What made social democrats such a dominant intellectual force in European democratic societies was that they stressed and practiced social cohesion, solidarity, and collectivism.
未來的解答?SO WHAT can be done? A wide-ranging public debate on the future of European social democracy has only just begun and it would be foolish to suggest that any one person or party has found a convincing answer to the problems of political decline in turbulent times.





不知多少人看得懂...隨手翻譯一下,有錯誤請提出來
所有當代趨勢都顯示,他們正創造一種創新而複雜的勞動階級;這個階級的特性在於,他們重視內在的差異勝過集體意識。這對社會民主的前景相當不利。就歷史來說,歐洲中間偏左的民主派政黨在戰間期贏得政權,但是由其在1945年以後,透過「人民XX黨」無上的選舉號召力,也在勞動階級的公會組織中擁有重要的勢力。之所以能夠這樣,是由於他們接受了由社會主義及後來的社會民主義兩者的意識形態所強化的綱領與價值。為什麼社會民主在歐洲民主社會會有這樣強大的獨佔力量,正因為他們強調團結、一致跟集體意識。
所以會怎樣?對於未來歐洲社會民主發展的爭論才剛開始,而白癡的是,這樣的爭論可能會使每個人或每個政黨都對於混亂時代政治勢力的衰退都有自己的一套說法。
@important C: you do a nice job! Many thanks.
那些老教條已經對日益分歧的選民愈來愈沒吸引力,向右靠老臉又拉不太下,不左不右的東西也是淪為口號,沒有實績,待了很久的英國似乎是如此,如何有個不會衰退的經濟,維持社會即有生活水平,避免社會衝突激化,Labour 跟Conservative上台能做的差別不大...